🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.